![]() To date, this is the only archaeological evidence of crucifixion in the ancient world. Illustration Courtesy of MassExplained App The illustration below shows the most probable posture he assumed. Yehohanan’s hands did not exhibit any puncture wounds therefore, it is conjectured that he was tied. In addition, wood was found under the head of the nail, indicating that a piece of wood was inserted so as to increase the size of the nail’s head making it difficult for the condemned to free his foot. In this case, the nail was inserted in the side of the heel, below the ankle. In traditional paintings and sculptures, Christ’s feet overlap one another and a single nail transverses both via the dorsum pedis. The nail used by the Roman soldiers in the archaeological discovery did not penetrate the foot from the top like most crucifixion depictions. As a result, the foot and nail were removed together along with part of the wooden cross. The soldiers were unable to detach his right foot since the nail bent after striking a knot in the wood. The ossuary containing the remains bears a Hebrew inscription- Yehohanan ben Hagkol-which, in English is John, son of Hagkol.Īfter his death, the body was brought down for burial. The bones of a man crucified at the same time as Jesus were excavated in Jerusalem in 1968. They cite the fact that, with one exception, there is no archaeological evidence of a body with nail marks from crucifixion. Some historians maintain that most crucifixion victims were tied to the cross, rather than nailed. ![]() Recently, however, this theory has been challenged. For centuries, this was accepted as fact. Most paintings depicting the crucifixion show Jesus’ hands and feet nailed to the cross.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |